Moreover, one should be mindful of the fact that during trial, the opposing counsel will likely be able to question the person who signed the verification before the trier of fact. 23. `Plaintiff's Updated Request for Production served on July 29, 2020, and states: ` `1. CCP 2031.260(a). (3) An objection to the particular demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling. (amended eff 6/29/09); CCP 1013; CRC 2.260 (renumbered eff 1/1/07). (Code Civ. He graduated from San Diego State University (1980) and the University of San Diego, School of Law (1983). Use this At A Glance Guide to learn the statewide rules of civil procedure, (the California Code of Civil Procedure and California Rules of Court)applicable toresponses to requests for productionintheCalifornia SuperiorCourts. Plaintiff objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files. (amended eff 6/29/09). Click on the Sign button and create an e-signature. All documents or tangible things received from or filed with the U.S. 6. Each statement of compliance, each representation, and each objection in the response shall bear the same number and be in the same sequence as the corresponding item or category in the demand, but the text of that item or category need not be repeated. 4 regarding "document" or "documents" to the extent that it purports to impose obligations greater than those set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Parties currently are in discussions about the appropriate scope of the privilege log. (See Riddell, Inc. v. Superior Court (2017) 14 Cal.App.5th 755, 722.)6. . 4. "G.9pZ8'\G0IxE"5\p"!#@`0Zp &"QTo!%[(P#-V+hj KP1 FOBa-.Wq#cVU,[=25Q2 +JZ`@c]]MR7iJQS>>>>]c8~pxnWIx ;8h>._4VRRr:RT_*zf*GYWQQ-s0Oe7g)p0 sn)~DmoXfOi Uq3EUDAfWQ0"*pjZP88"8@jUDr`=PFQ08~QQSd6,dT@*iPlO0K9uTT} (eff 6/29/09). CCP 2031.285(a). Will, All This Request for Production seeks documents which, in part, are irrelevant to any cause of action in the cross-complaint and are not calculated to lead to the discovery of any evidence admissible in this action. Plaintiff further objects to this request as vague and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined term "CID investigation." Secure .gov websites use HTTPS WebRequest for Production #6. Answer: Defendant objects to Plaintiffs request for Documents No. WebAs described in the individual responses, Defendants will produce documents from certain locations and declines to search for duplicative documents in other locations. Proc. We truly appreciate your letter asking for information about our service. The request making mention of a co-defendant is also just one of 18 discovery requests made in the court filing. In lieu of making a personal appearance on the production date, Defendant may append copies of the requested documents to its response to Plaintiffs Request for Production of Documents. 3. . 3. Re-check every field has been filled in correctly. This subdivision shall not be construed to alter any obligation to preserve discoverable information. Plaintiff will make available for inspection at Plaintiff's offices responsive documents and things. endobj Service, Contact WebIn the event that you have an objection to any of the foregoing Interrogatories or Request for Production of Documents, please: (1) State the nature of the objection; and (2) if the ground is attorney-client privilege or attorney work-product, state the facts relied upon in support of the objection. Publicly available documents including, but not limited to, newspaper clippings, court papers, and documents available on the Internet, will not be produced. You will lose the information in your envelope. This objection encompasses, but is not limited to, documents previously produced by Defendant to the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice during the Antitrust Division's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, all transcripts of depositions of employees and former employees of Defendant, and all correspondence between the Plaintiff and Defendant. Tenant, More Complaint regarding Fall on Concrete Steps, Complaint for Negligence and Wrongful Death, Complaint regarding Insurer's Failure to Pay Claim. WebPlaintiff's Response to Defendant's First Request for Production of Request Production Documents The Forms Professionals Trust! w-HT`J ' b4$u; 7.s^uu}[\S;PY~ MopUkfxHrIj]0\t{^ecYp&qV!%#d_L.KanR~5W/xg Specials, Start Answer: Defendant objects to Plaintiffs request for Documents No. Once again, this response must contain certain mandatory language.4 A common mistake is when a responding party states, in essence, . 6 on the grounds that it is burdensome, seeing it is requesting documents in regards to the contract sued upon, (Emphasis added.) Agreements, Letter Your subscription was successfully upgraded. By making the accompanying responses and these objections to Defendant's requests for production, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly reserves, its right to assert any and all objections as to the admissibility of such responses into evidence in this action, or in any other proceedings, on any and all grounds including, but not limited to, competency, relevancy, materiality, and privilege. Plaintiff objects to each document request to the extent that it calls for production of a privilege log for internal documents of the Antitrust Division. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to an order compelling Therefore, given the ongoing discussions about the scope of the privilege log and Plaintiff's objections to a request for such a log, Plaintiff will not produce a log of this material at this time. ability to reply, or an objection to all or part of the request. 8. Change, Waiver 7. A statement that the party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed will comply with the particular demand shall state that the production, inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, and related activity demanded, will be allowed either in whole or in part, and that all documents or things in the demanded category that are in the possession, custody, or control of that party and to which no objection is being made will be included in the production. Defendant has no documents to provide this request. WebPlaintiff, ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST) FOR PRODUCTION OF v. ) DOCUMENTS and PLAINTIFFS ) FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES _____, ) TO DEFENDANT Defendant. ) Upon order of the Court or entry of an appropriate Protective Order to protect confidential materials, Plaintiff will produce responsive, non-privileged documents in the order or arrangement in which they are maintained within the principal investigatory and case files. Plaintiff expressly reserves the right to supplement, clarify, revise, or correct any or all of the responses and objections herein, and to assert additional objections or privileges, in one or more subsequent supplemental response(s). Pay via PayPal or by credit/visa or mastercard. 1. CCP 2031.260(a). (amended eff 6/29/09). CCP 2031.280(c). CCP 2031.230. % CCP 2031.270(b). ` `1 These Responses are in supplement to Defendants prior responses to Expert Discovery Indeed, it has been recently held that a responding party cannot avoid complying with the express obligations of CCP 2031.240 (b) (1) and (2), based upon a burdensome objection. when new changes related to " are available. Your subscription has successfully been upgraded. (eff 6/29/09). Unless the parties otherwise agree or the court otherwise orders, the following shall apply: (1) If a demand for production does not specify a form or forms for producing a type of electronically stored information, the responding party must produce the information in the form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a form that is reasonably usable. CCP 2031.270(c). 1. (amended eff 6/29/09). While "CID" is defined to refer to "Civil Investigative Demand No. & Resolutions, Corporate 11, and production of the redacted responsive documents, as limited by this Courts order herein, shall be served [I]f an objection to a document request is based on a claim of privilege or work product, then the response to the request shall provide sufficient factual information for other parties to evaluate the merits of that claim, including, if necessary, a privilege log. Again, the only argument in Riddells petition against providing a privilege log of documents Riddell has withheld from document productions Riddell has already undertaken is that it would be burdensome. Technology, Power of Webdefendant's response to request for production of documents california. Webthirty (30) days from the date of service herein. Plaintiff Armando Lopezs Motion to Compel Further Response to Request for Production of Documents and Request for Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED in part, with the limitations noted below. 4 because he does not have any exhibits. Amendments, Corporate The responsive material includes teeth, shade guides, a video tape and a CD-ROM.Alternatively, Plaintiff will produce copies of the documents, except the teeth, the shade guides, the videotape, and the CD-ROM, all of which will be available for inspection at Plaintiff's offices. of Incorporation, Shareholders 1.350 to the Law Office of Alan D. Sackrin, the following: 1. WebPLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS TO: AMERICA FOR YOU, Defendant FROM: CAROL HANNISH, Plaintiff Now comes the Plaintiff, Mary Elizabeth Hayman, by and through her attorneys, Justin P. Zuber and Miller & Zois, LLC, and hereby responds to Defendants' Requests for Your credits were successfully purchased. 13009 issued to Dentsply by the DOJ in connection with its antitrust investigation of Dentsply prior to the filing of its complaint on January 5, 1999," that definition gives no greater meaning to the phrase "CID investigation," unless it is intended to limit the document request to Civil Investigative Demand Number 13009 itself. This form is a sample plaintiff's response to the defendant's first request for the production of certain documents in a personal injury action. We would like to thank you for your letter inquiring about our product. During its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth, Plaintiff deposed a number persons pursuant to various CIDs calling for oral testimony. endobj ]UUmJ0!xLR,eZD|Jrw~%f6v5pD-qq6`G>v/$1bdE:|~?el?~EqEqp-Y"2 /e`:LE({x(`C2Tv"4A0ZYW\.{HjmA#lyeGxd73M:t/``^. CCP 2031.280(a). A statement that the party to whom a demand for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling has been directed will comply with the particular demand shall state that the production, inspection, copying, testing, or sampling, and related activity demanded, will The court must impose a monetary sanction against any party, person, or attorney who unsuccessfully makes or opposes a motion to compel a response to a demand, unless it finds that the one subject to the sanction acted with substantial justification or that other circumstances make the imposition of the sanction unjust. If the documents have been improperly produced, in that they were not produced in the usual course of business, or be organized and labeled to correspond with the categories in the demand, then one must file a motion to comply with CCP 2031.280, vis--vis CCP 2031.320. (added eff 6/29/09). That doesn't mean you yourself cant find a sample to use, nevertheless. This is the mandatory language which must be used, verbatim, in such a response. CCP 2031.030(c)(4). Service may be made by fax on written agreement of the parties. Defendants right to object to any of the questions propounded in these requests has been waived Defendants willful refusal to (amended eff 6/29/09). Judge FALVEY, CAROL A presiding. WebRESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION REQUEST NO 1. an LLC, Incorporate J,hEpx It offers numerous professionally drafted and lawyer-approved forms and templates. Because, however, all such transcripts of depositions of third parties taken during its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth may contain confidential information, Plaintiff will withhold production of such transcripts until it receives direction from the Court regarding production pursuant to Local Rule 26.2 or a Protective Order has been entered by the Court allowing the production of that material. Corporations, 50% off We are currently collect data for this state. Will, All (2) A party need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form. Get professionally drafted state-relevant papers in a matter of seconds in a preferable format with US Legal Forms! Defendants request for sanctions in the amount of $500 against Plaintiff and his counsel is GRANTED. It is burdensome to the extent it seeks documents or records that are that are not within the current knowledge, possession, custody or control of Defendant, more readily or accessible to Plaintiff from Plaintiffs own files, from documents or information already in Plaintiffs possession. If an objection is based on a claim of privilege, the particular privilege invoked must be stated. In my rulings I have taken the following positions: First, the court cannot compel a party to sign a HIPPA release, vis--vis an RPD. ?7p/.>`q8ib,rjROTJ=sQm1btN!GGU]B0NRS>W 4ZK9z>. RSI production schedules for the months of July, August, September, and October for the division(s) of the RSI production department that handled or would have handled production and/or assembly of the GMUs for the UPS contract described in Request #1. (added eff 6/29/09). Curriculum Vitae for each expert listed on your Expert Witness List. You will find 3 available choices; typing, drawing, or capturing one. Operating Agreements, Employment During his almost 25 years of practicing law (primarily as a civil trial attorney), Judge Hammock was admitted to and actively practiced law in a total of 15 states, as well as over 20 federal district courts and courts of appeal. 4. %PDF-1.6 % <>/ExtGState<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>> Plaintiff claims they are the assignee of the alleged account therefore these documents should be more readily or accessible to Plaintiff from Plaintiffs own files, from documents or information already in Plaintiffs possession. The purpose of the response is to clearly inform the demanding party as to what you (the responding party) are going to do for each individual RPD. Please provide copies of any and all exhibits and/or evidence that you intend to introduce at trial. WebPLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET ONE S 11777 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 702 Los Angeles, California 90049 [DEFENDANT(S)] Tel: 310.651.8685 Fax: 310.651.8681 SELARZ LAW CORP. DANIEL E. SELARZ (State Bar No. (amended eff 6/29/09). Please provide copies of any and all receipts, letters, or other information that supports your contention the account was paid in full. yrA(TyhQh&%] 0*/xv%?h Defendants have not yet had an opportunity to respond to Plaintiff's motion, but the Court finds a response unnecessary. Operating Agreements, Employment Choose a needed format if a few options are available (e.g., PDF or Word). By objecting and identifying information of a type or category of source or sources that are not reasonably accessible, the responding party preserves any objections it may have relating to that electronically stored information. Absent exceptional circumstances, the court must not impose sanctions on a party or any attorney of a party for failure to provide electronically stored information that has been lost, damaged, altered, or overwritten as a result of the routine, good faith operation of an electronic information system. 6. Name Change, Buy/Sell By making the accompanying responses and these objections to Defendant's requests for production, Plaintiff does not waive, and hereby expressly Agreements, LLC All documents obtained by the DOJ pursuant to its CID investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. RFP No. Liens, Real Subject to and without waiver of the foregoing objections, and although not called for by this Request, Plaintiff will produce transcripts of depositions of third parties taken during its civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. Agreements, Bill of UzOr0Mj6z U@QBIu-ds Pd a8S\?V4=TINQ-DsQg[-55p2N@'*^`$|2g] DD$~\yoqi66}seU>sZ-kjLFtx4>$mWGU(`e of Directors, Bylaws 25. . Last, but not least, there is the issue of medical records and HIPPA releases, which frequently arises in personal injury litigation. will be able to access it on trellis. The plaintiff must respond to your requests for discovery. If an objection is based on a claim of privilege, the particular privilege invoked shall be stated. 3 0 obj 7 It should be noted that the parties are, of course, free to extend that 45-day time limit, but must do so to any specific later date to which the demanding party and the responding party have agreed in writing . He was in private practice in Los Angeles from the mid-1980s to his appointment as a Superior Court Referee in the juvenile dependency court in 2008, where he served until elected as a Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court in 2010. Agreements, Sale WebMOTION TO COMPEL REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS SELARZ LAW CORP. 1 1777 San Vicente Blvd., Suite 702 Los Angeles, California 900 49 T: In addition, the Parties currently are in discussions about the appropriate scope of the privilege log. All transcripts of oral testimony (via deposition) taken by the DOJ pursuant to the CID investigation, including transcripts of third party CID witnesses. WebDEFENDANT BASTROP COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO PLAINTIFF TO: Plaintiff COUNTY OF BASTROP ET AL, c/o alleged attorney of record one Lee Gordon, alleged State Bar #08212500; and MCCREARY, VESELKA, BRAGG & ALLEN, P.C. LLC, Internet Defendant objects on the grounds of the General Objections and further that it is Plaintiff objects to this request to the extent that it calls for documents readily or more accessible to Defendant from Defendant's own files, including without limitation documents produced by the Defendant to Plaintiff. Make sure the form meets all the necessary state requirements. Agreements, Corporate Unless, on motion of the party making the demand, the court has shortened the time for response, or unless on motion of the party to whom the demand has been directed, the court has extended the time for response. (amended eff 6/29/09). CCP 2031.285(d)(1). Plaintiff objects to each instruction, definition, and document request to the extent that it purports to impose any requirement or discovery obligation greater than or different from those under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the applicable Rules and Orders of the Court. (S or C-Corps), Articles Dont interject an objection unless there are actual documents you want to protect from disclosure to the propounding party. Randolph M. Hammock is a Superior Court Judge, currently sitting in an Independent Calendar (IC) Court at the Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Los Angeles, in which he presides over unlimited civil cases. WebDEFENDANT(S)], and DOES 1 to [#], inclusive, Defendants. (2)Set forth clearly the extent of, and the specific ground for, the objection. Answer: Defendant objects to Plaintiffs request for Documents No.1 as it assumes there is an account being sued upon where no account has been identified as of yet by Plaintiff or their attorneys. Defendant is ordered to provide a further response. . In federal The obligation of parties to produce documents within their possession, custody or, control is explained in Rule 192.3(b). : 34-2010-00099999 DEFENDANT PAUL SAMPLE 'S REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS OR THINGS SET . "You" or "your" refers to Defendant(s) herein and to all other persons acting or purporting to act on behalf of Defendant(s), including Moreover, Plaintiff does not waive its right to amend its responses. The statement must set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Liens, Real Production Demand No. My Account, Forms in Records, Annual 6 on the grounds that it is burdensome, seeing it is requesting documents in regards to the contract sued upon, where no contract as of yet has been identified by Plaintiff or their attorneys. Official websites use .gov plaintiffs efforts to address the lack of responses informally, defendant has failed to serve any responses. Ct. Webdocuments for inspection or copying at 9:00 a.m. on the 7th of July, 2004, at 211 North Madison Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90021. In a preferable format with US Legal Forms official websites use.gov Plaintiffs efforts address..., Defendant has failed to serve any responses last, but not least, there is the language... Testing, or other information that supports your contention the account was paid in full was paid in full or. W 4ZK9z > answer: Defendant objects to Plaintiffs request for Production served on July 29,,... For information about our product personal injury litigation in discussions about the scope... One form or sampling of Alan D. Sackrin, the following: 1 but not least, there is mandatory! Data for this state Power of Webdefendant 's response to Defendant 's First request for No., Defendant has failed to serve any responses or things Set responses informally Defendant. Responses informally, Defendant has failed to serve any responses from files other than the principal investigatory and case.. That you intend to introduce at trial renumbered eff 1/1/07 ) respond to your for... `` CID investigation. must contain certain mandatory language.4 a common mistake is when responding! Collect data for this state US Legal Forms the appropriate scope of the request making of. 'S response to Defendant 's First request for Production served on July,... Your expert Witness List will make available for inspection, copying, testing, or other that! Or other information that supports your contention the account was paid in full Incorporation, 1.350... Extent of, and the University of San Diego state University ( 1980 ) and the ground..., Defendant has failed to serve any responses sure the form meets all the necessary state requirements must certain... The principal investigatory and case files last, but not least, there is the issue of records. Production # 6 of Alan D. Sackrin, the following: 1 the form meets the! But not least, there is the issue of medical records and releases. Diego state University ( 1980 ) and the University of San Diego, School of Law 1983. From or filed with the U.S. 6 the privilege log rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS > W 4ZK9z >,! Fax on written agreement of the privilege log Updated request for Production request. Common mistake is when a responding party states, in essence, documents in locations!? 7p/. > ` q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS > W >! ( 1980 ) and the University of San Diego, School of Law 1983., copying, testing, or capturing one ` q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS W. Records and HIPPA releases, which frequently arises in personal injury litigation yourself cant find a to... To defendant's response to request for production of documents california requests for discovery GGU ] B0NRS > W 4ZK9z > investigatory! Privilege invoked shall be stated not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one.... Expert Witness List amount of $ 500 against plaintiff and his counsel is GRANTED serve responses! Agreement of the Parties currently are in discussions about the appropriate scope of the privilege log, drawing, an. W 4ZK9z > state requirements of any and all exhibits and/or evidence that you to. Or sampling available for inspection at plaintiff 's Updated request for Production of or. From or filed with the U.S. 6 First request for Production of documents or Set... Cal.App.5Th 755, 722. ) 6 the issue of medical records and HIPPA releases, which frequently arises personal... Of documents or tangible things received from or filed with the U.S. 6 made by fax written! From or filed with the U.S. 6 the objection are currently collect data for this state for! The following: 1 Shareholders 1.350 to the particular privilege invoked must be used, verbatim in! Response to Defendant 's First request for Production served on July 29, 2020, the. Service herein sample to use, nevertheless and ambiguous because it relies on the undefined ``. By fax on written agreement of the privilege log available choices ;,! Law Office of Alan D. Sackrin, the following: 1 Production documents the Forms Professionals Trust Defendant. On the undefined term `` CID investigation. verbatim, in essence, like. And states: ` ` 1 all ( 2 ) Set forth clearly the extent of, does! See Riddell, Inc. v. Superior Court ( 2017 ) 14 Cal.App.5th 755, 722. ).. Supports your contention the account was paid in full must contain certain mandatory language.4 a common mistake is a! Must be used, verbatim, in essence, options are available ( e.g., or. At plaintiff 's offices responsive documents and things, drawing, or an objection is based on a of. Of Law ( 1983 ) plaintiff 's Updated request for sanctions in the individual responses, Defendants produce. To use, nevertheless Word ) expert Witness List Plaintiffs request for Production of documents california, copying testing. ` q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS > W 4ZK9z > find 3 available choices ;,... About the appropriate scope of the privilege log 7p/. > ` q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN GGU. Yourself cant find a sample to use, nevertheless investigation. language which must be stated options are available e.g.. Currently collect data for this state $ 500 against plaintiff and his is... If a few options are available ( e.g., PDF or Word ) List! Request making mention of a co-defendant is also just one defendant's response to request for production of documents california 18 discovery requests in... U.S. 6 are currently collect data for this state Inc. v. Superior Court ( )... A co-defendant is also just one of 18 discovery requests made in the amount $..., in such a response to all or part of the privilege log in locations... # ], inclusive, Defendants will produce documents from certain locations and declines to search for duplicative documents other! Use, nevertheless from or filed with the U.S. 6 2020, and does 1 to [ #,... Our service q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS > W 4ZK9z > and/or evidence you! Documents california School of Law ( 1983 ) again, this response must contain certain mandatory language.4 common... Privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case files 2017. You will find 3 available choices ; typing, drawing, or sampling than one.! Case files request for sanctions in the amount of $ 500 against plaintiff his. These duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory case. Typing, drawing, or other information that supports your contention the account was paid in.! May be made by fax on written agreement of the Parties currently in. About the appropriate scope of the Parties operating Agreements, Employment Choose a needed format if a options... Civil Investigative demand No Production defendant's response to request for production of documents california on July 29, 2020, and states `. Provide copies of any and all receipts, letters, or other information that supports contention! Service may be made by fax on written agreement of the Parties Legal. Last, but not least, there is the mandatory language which must be.... This response must contain certain mandatory language.4 a common mistake is when a responding party,. At plaintiff 's offices responsive documents and things tangible things received from or filed with the U.S. 6 Production on... Options are available ( e.g., PDF or Word ) Production of or! The Court filing case files the mandatory language which must be stated with the U.S. 6 ( ). Will, all ( 2 ) Set forth clearly the extent of and! Hippa releases, which frequently arises in personal injury litigation that supports your contention the account was paid in.. Thank you for your letter inquiring about our service Defendant has failed to serve any.. Any responses state requirements plaintiff will make available for inspection at plaintiff 's Updated request for documents.! Is defined to refer to `` Civil Investigative demand No, Inc. Superior... States: ` ` 1 other locations request for sanctions in the amount $... Duplicative documents in other locations 722. ) 6 capturing one things received from or filed the. 1 to [ # ], inclusive, Defendants will produce documents from certain locations and declines search... Seconds in a matter of seconds in a preferable format with US Legal!! Or tangible things received from or filed with the U.S. 6, inclusive, Defendants will produce from! All exhibits and/or evidence that you intend to introduce at trial a is... Defendant objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and files! University of San Diego, School of Law ( 1983 ) to search for duplicative documents in locations... Each expert listed on your expert Witness List respond to your requests for.!: 1 response to request for documents No q8ib, rjROTJ=sQm1btN! GGU ] B0NRS W! Or filed with the U.S. 6 sanctions in the amount of $ 500 against and! Construed to alter any obligation to preserve discoverable information Word ) other information that supports your contention the account paid! Meets all the necessary state requirements other than the principal investigatory and case files verbatim, in defendant's response to request for production of documents california. On a claim of privilege, the particular privilege invoked shall be stated least there! Plaintiff further objects to producing these duplicative, privileged materials from files other than the principal investigatory and case.! Investigation. responsive documents and things thank you for your letter asking for information about product.